In recent times, an alarming narrative has emerged within the Malaysian blogosphere, suggesting a historical event that appears to be a misinterpretation or perhaps a deliberate misinformation campaign. The claim revolves around a so called Malay prince named Manabharana from Srivijaya, purportedly attacking and conquering the Chola kingdom. This misleading story has gained traction and is spreading like wildfire across various social media platforms. The need to address and rectify such inaccuracies is crucial not only for the sake of historical accuracy but also for fostering a responsible and informed online community. To delve into the matter, it is essential to clarify that historical records reveal the existence of multiple individuals named Manabharana throughout history. However, a nuanced understanding reveals that all these figures were Tamils (Damila) hailing from the Pandya kingdom, with references to their exploits documented in Tamil inscriptions and Sri Lankan chronicles
There is an on going, never ending debate on Tamil New Year. It all started in the 20th century. The Theorist believe that the new year should be on 1st Thai, not 1st Cittirai. The Traditionalist choose to hold on to the existing date. Before we dwell further into the topic. Let's look at some basics. We start with an introduction to the 12 Tamil months and the associated zodiacs. The Tamil calendar is a sidereal solar calendar. Today, 21 March in the Gregorian calendar is also 8 paṅkuṉi in the Tamil calendar. The Traditionalist celebrate new year on 1 Cittirai. That usually falls on 13-14 April each year. They also celebrate Ponggal on 1 Thai. The Traditionalist are the majority among the existing Tamil population. The Theorist believes that the new year should be on 1 Thai, not 1 Cittirai. Which means Ponggal is new year for them when it is a harvest festival for the rest of the Tamils. They have their reasons. Let's look at their reasons. # 1. Maraimal