In recent times, an alarming narrative has emerged within the Malaysian blogosphere, suggesting a historical event that appears to be a misinterpretation or perhaps a deliberate misinformation campaign. The claim revolves around a so called Malay prince named Manabharana from Srivijaya, purportedly attacking and conquering the Chola kingdom. This misleading story has gained traction and is spreading like wildfire across various social media platforms. The need to address and rectify such inaccuracies is crucial not only for the sake of historical accuracy but also for fostering a responsible and informed online community. To delve into the matter, it is essential to clarify that historical records reveal the existence of multiple individuals named Manabharana throughout history. However, a nuanced understanding reveals that all these figures were Tamils (Damila) hailing from the Pandya kingdom, with references to their exploits documented in Tamil inscriptions and Sri Lankan chronicles...
Part 6: Bishop Caldwell and the Tamil Dravidians
by
D.P.
Sivaram
[courtesy:
Lanka
Guardian,
August
1,
1992,
pp.11-12
and
24;
prepared
by
Sachi
Sri
Kantha,
for
the
electronic
record]
Robert
Caldwell
(1819-1891)
was
the
father
of
the
Dravidian
movement.
He
was
the
Bishop
of
Tinnevely
–
the
heartland
of
the
Maravar
Poligars
–
during
the
times
when
the
British
were
engaged
in
suppressing
the
Tamil
military
castes
in
the
Tamil
region.
His
monumental
work,
The
Comparative
Grammar
of
the
Dravidian
Languages,
which
was
published
in
1856,
laid
the
theoretical
foundation
of
the
political,
academic
and
cultural
movement
that
came
to
dominate
Tamilian
life
in
the
twentieth
century.
The
work
argues
that
all
south
Indian
languages
(and
a
few
others
elsewhere
in
the
subcontinent,
like
Brahui)
belong
to
a
distinct
family
of
tongues
called
the
Dravidian
languages.
This
challenged
the
widely
held
view
of
the
time
that
most
of
India’s
cultivated
languages
were
derived
from
Sanskrit.
It
followed
therefore
that
the
culture
and
civilization
of
the
Dravidian
peoples
of
south
India
were
intrinsically
unique.
The
role
of
these
ideas
in
the
inception
of
the
Dravidian
movement
has
been
examined
in
detail
elsewhere
(Irshick;
1969,
Hardgrave;
1965,
Sivathamby:1978).
These
studies
have
been
in
terms
of
the
cultural
and
political
contradictions
between
the
newly
arisen
non-Brahmin
elites
and
the
Brahmins
who
had
achieved
a
pre-eminent
place
under
colonial
rule
in
the
Madras
Presidency.
The
intention
of
this
study
however
is
to
show
that
the
fundamental
tenets
of
the
nascent
phase
of
the
Dravidian
ideology
were
essentially
linked
to
the
political
and
cultural
legacies
of
the
British
attempt
to
demilitarize
Tamil
society.
The
writings
of
Bishop
Caldwell
presuppose
a
teleological
project
which
was
not
uncommon
to
what
were
conceived
as
great
intellectual
undertakings
in
that
era
of
empire
building.
The
assumptions
of
the
project
formed
the
basis
of
his
Dravidian
theory.
They
were,
(a)
That
the
British
empire
was
destined
to
finally
bring
order
amongst
Tamils,
a
large
portion
of
whom
had
been
more
prone
to
the
habit
of
war
than
to
the
arts
of
peace
from
the
dawn
of
history
in
south
India,
(b)
That
this
order
would
be
the
one
in
which
the
imminent
protestant
ethos
of
the
Dravidian
civilization
would
reach
its
full
expressional
ethos
which
the
English
administrator
saw
as
the
virtue
of
those
classes
which
"contrasted
favourably
with
the
Maravar",
and
whom
the
Bishop
considered
the
legitimate
Tamilians,
(c)
That
the
rediscovery
of
Dravidian
linguistic
and
cultural
uniqueness
would
help
consolidate
the
position
of
the
‘lower
classes’
among
the
Tamils
who
had
played
an
important
role
in
the
military
expansion
of
British
rule
in
the
subcontinent
–
the
Tamil
Christian
soldiers
who
were
the
Empire’s
alternative
to
the
traditional
Tamil
military
castes.
In
the
concluding
remarks
of
his
‘A
History
of
Tinnevely’(1888),
Caldwell
says,
"A
mixed
government…came
thus
to
an
end
and
was
succeeded
by
a
government
purely
English,
at
unity
with
itself,
and
as
just
as
it
was
powerful.
The
results
of
this
change
have
been
most
important
and
valuable.
Professor
Wilson…places
in
a
striking
light
the
course
things
would
have
taken
if
the
English
Government
had
not
been
enabled
to
interpose
its
authority.
It
may
be
concluded,"
he
says,
"that
had
not
a
wise
and
powerful
policy
interfered
to
enforce
the
habits
of
social
life,
the
fine
districts
to
the
south
of
Kaveri…would
have
reverted
to
the
state
in
which
tradition
describes
them
long
anterior
to
Christianity,
and
would
have
once
more
have
become
a
suitable
domicile
for
the
goblins
of
Ravana."
The
first
reflection
that
arises
in
one’s
mind
on
reading
the
foregoing
sketch
of
the
history
of
this
district
is,
that
war
seems
to
have
been
the
normal
condition
of
Tinnevely,
as
of
the
rest
of
the
old
Pandya
country…from
the
beginning
of
man’s
abode
in
these
regions
till
A.D.
1801
(the
year
in
which
the
Tamil
country
was
ceded
to
the
British).
Caldwell
also
notes
that,
"Of
the
beneficial
changes
that
have
taken
place
since
then,
the
most
remarkable
is
that
which
we
see
in
the
Poligars
themselves."
He
claims
with
satisfaction
that
many
among
the
regions
martial
classes
were
taking
to
agriculture;
and
of
the
Maravar,
he
says
"the
change
wrought
amongst
the
poorer
class
of
the
Maravas
is
not
perhaps
quite
so
complete…though
once
the
terror
of
the
country
they
are
now
amenable
to
law
and
reason…"
Tamil
society
was
thus
‘unity
with
itself’
and
was
realising
its
destiny
under
the
British
Empire.
He
asserts
that
"Race
after
race
of
rulers
have
risen
up
in
this
country,
has
been
tried
and
found
wanting,
and
has
passed
away."
But
that
the
Tamils
"accept
our
government
readily
and
willingly
as
the
best
government
they
have
ever
had
and
the
best
they
are
likely
to
have
in
this
age
of
the
world."
Under
the
"paternal
government"
of
the
English,
Tamils
were
becoming
a
peaceful
and
industrious
nation.
The
last
"race
of
rulers"
which
had
risen
up
and
passed
away
in
the
Tamil
country
were
the
turbulent
Maravar.
English
rule
was
the
only
one
that
was
not
found
wanting
because
its
principles
and
protestant
ethos
were
in
consonance
with
what
Caldwell
assumed
were
the
‘true’
religious
and
moral
ideas
of
the
Dravidian
race.
Although
as
a
historian,
he
was
well
aware
of
the
hegemony
of
the
Maravar’s
martial
culture
in
Tamil
society,
its
exclusion
from
what
he
desired
to
portray
as
the
true
Dravidian
civilization
was
central
to
the
imperial
and
religious
interests
of
Caldwell’s
teleologial
project.
The
English,
in
suppressing
the
martial
castes,
were
restoring
the
soverignty
of
Tamil
society’s
"legitimate
rulers"
–
the
peasantry
and
lower
classes.
In
Caldwell’s
view,
the
Tamil
military
castes
had
to
seek
"the
safer
and
more
reputable
occupation
of
husbandmen"
(Caldwell:
1888,
p.229).
However,
he
was
deeply
suspicious
of
their
peace.
Commenting
on
the
Poligar
wars,
he
wrote,
"The
population
of
the
sequestered
Pollams
(Palayams)
seemed
to
be
delighted
with
the
opportunity
afforded
them
of
trying
their
strength
with
the
English
once
more,
being
thoroughly
discontented,
no
doubt,
with
the
peaceful
life
now
required
of
them"
(p.197).
And
he
condemned
a
suggestion
ventured
by
the
author
of
the
Tinnevely
Manual,
Mr.Stuart
that
the
Palayam
system
of
the
Tamil
military
castes
was
histocially
inevitable
as
the
fiefdoms
of
medieval
Europe
–
"It
is
so
seldom
that
one
hears
a
good
word
about
Poligars
that
I
quote
these
remarks
of
Mr.Stuart
with
pleasure…I
fear,
however,
that
the
misdeeds
of
the
Poligars
were
more
systematic
and
audacious
than
those
of
the
feudal
nobles
of
Europe
in
the
Middle
Ages."
(p.59)
Apart
from
concerns
shared
with
the
British
Government,
the
Bishop’s
hostile
attitude
towards
the
Maravar
arose
from
the
bloody
violence
they
unleashed
on
the
Shanar,
large
numbers
of
whom
were
embracing
the
Protestant
faith.
For
him,
if
the
idolatory
and
the
Sanskritic
culture
of
the
articulate
Brahmins
was
a
spiritual
threat
to
the
propagation
of
the
Gospel,
the
violence
and
misdeeds
of
the
Maravar
against
the
faithful
was
a
dire
physical
threat.
In
his
scheme
of
Tamilian
history,
the
culture
and
ethos
of
the
classes
through
whom
the
British
government
and
the
Anglican
Church
sought
to
consolidate
the
gains
of
Tamil
society’s
demilitarization
were
seen
by
Caldwell
as
the
true
characteristics
of
the
Tamils.
The
martial
habits
of
the
Maravar
and
the
Sanskritic
culture
of
the
Brahmins
were
alien
to
the
social
order
and
moral
ideals
of
the
‘true’
Dravidians.
These
views
were
shared
by
many
English
missionaries
of
the
19th
century
who
worked
among
the
Tamils.
Missionaries
and
administrators
found
evidence
for
this
in
many
religious
and
didactic
Tamil
texts.
Henry
Martyn
Scudder
published
a
book
in
1865,
in
which
he
"used
Tamil
texts
and
poems
to
support
the
missionary
position
that
even
in
ancient
Tamil
texts
many
Christian
ideas
were
present."
(Irshick;
1976,
p.15).
This
belief
led
to
the
introduction
of
what
were
thought
to
be
Tamil
works,
with
little
or
no
extraneous
influence
in
institutions
of
higher
education
run
by
missionaries.
The
college
curriculum
created
a
market
for
the
publication
of
such
works.
This
in
turn
gave
an
impetus
to
the
rediscovery
of
many
ancient
Tamil
works
(U.V.Saminatha
Iyer;
En
Sarithiram,
p.714).,
which
paradoxically
led
to
the
publication
of
Purananooru
and
the
Purapporul
Venba
Malai,
texts
that
portrayed
the
ancient
Tamils
as
a
fierce
martial
race
and
lay
the
foundation
of
modern
Tamil
militarism.
Thus
Caldwell’s
teleology
assumed
that
Tamil
revivalism
would
help
consolidate
the
protestant
ethic
and
the
allegiance
to
English
rule
among
the
non-military
castes
in
Tamil
society,
by
giving
expression
to
the
moral
and
religious
ideas
which
he
assumed
were
imminent
in
their
ancient
Dravidian
culture
and
language.
The
administrative
manual
of
the
Madurai
district
commended
a
section
of
this
class
of
Tamils
thus,
"They…contrast
favourably
with
the
Maravars,
being
very
orderly,
frugal,
and
industrious".
Other
section,
the
Shanar
it
was
stated,
"have
risen
enormously
in
the
social
scale
by
their
eagerness
for
education,
by
their
large
adoption
of
Christianity,
and
by
their
thrifty
habits.
Many
of
them
have
forced
themselves
ahead
of
the
Maravars
by
sheer
force
of
character."
(Thurston:
1906,
p.373).
It
was
to
these
‘loyal’
classes
of
Tamils
that
Caldwell
referred
to
when
he
wrote
in
the
introduction
to
his
Grammar
that
"All
throughout
Ceylon,
the
coolies
in
the
coffee
plantations
are
Tamilians;
the
majority
of
the
money-making
classes
even
in
Colombo
are
Tamilians;
and
it
seems
not
unlikely
that
[?]ere
long
the
Tamilians
will
have
excluded
the
Singhalese
from
almost
every
profitable
employment
in
their
own
Island.
The
majority
of
the
Klings
or
Hindus,
who
are
found
in
Pegu,
Penang,
Singapore
and
other
places
in
further
East,
are
Tamilians;
a
large
portion
of
the
Coolies
who
have
emigrated
in
such
numbers
to
the
Mauritius
and
to
the
West
Indian
colonies
are
Tamilians;
in
short
wherever
money
is
to
be
made,
wherever
a
more
apathetic
or
a
more
aristocratic
people
is
waiting
to
be
pushed
aside,
thither
swarm
the
Tamilians,
the
Greeks
or
Scotch
of
the
East,
the
least
superstitious
and
the
most
enterprising
and
persevering
race
of
Hindus."
(Caldwell:
1856,
p.7).
Caldwell’s
Dravidian
theory
thus
gave
rise
to
a
vocabulary
in
which
the
word
Tamil
came
to
connote
the
non-Brahmin,
non-martial
aspects
of
Tamil
culture.
Bishop
Robert
Caldwell
in
laying
the
foundation
of
the
Dravidian
movement
also
endeavoured
and
partially
succeeded
in
dispersing
the
impression
that
the
Tamils
who,
only
a
few
years
before
his
time
were
thought
of
as
being
"prone
to
the
habit
of
war",
were
a
peace
loving
and
industrious
nation.
The
intellectual
endeavours
of
the
learned
missionary
made
the
British
Empire
cherish
an
ulterior
hope
that
the
‘Dravidian’
Tamils
would
remain
the
faithful
among
the
faithless,
the
bedrock
of
the
Raj
for
a
long
time
to
come
–
the
events
of
the
great
mutiny
and
the
rise
of
the
Dravidian
movement
proved
them
correct.
Note
I
am
thankful
to
Mr.Joganathan
of
Wellawatte
for
drawing
my
attention
to
the
fact
that
the
Panivar
clan
of
Myliddy
is
also
connected
to
Ramnad.
My
information,
however,
was
based
on
(a)
Place
Name
Studies
–
Kankesanthurai
Circuit,
by
Dr.
E.
Balasunderam
of
the
Jaffna
University,
1988,
pp.5-6.
The
book
was
published
for
the
Mani
Vizha
of
S.
Appadurai
of
Myliddy.
(b)
An
interview
with
Mr.
Ratnalingam
of
Myliddy,
politburo
member
of
a
Tamil
militant
group
who
I
believe
is
a
relative
of
Mr.
Joganathan.
The
foot-notes
could
not
appear
due
to
an
unavoidable
circumstance.
Letter
of
Correspondent
Sachi
Sri
Kantha
[Osaka
565,
Japan]:
Prabhakaran’s
Mentors
[Lanka
Guardian,
August
1,
1992,
p.2]
D.
P.
Sivaram’s
thought-provoking
analysis
on
the
history
of
Tamil
militarism
(May
1,
May
15,
June
1
and
July
1)
was
a
delight
to
read.
However,
he
has
omitted
an
essential
contributing
factor
to
the
militarism
of
the
LTTE.
It
is
too
simplistic
to
believe
that
the
historical
traditions
of
the
different
castes
among
Tamils
in
Tamil
Nadu
and
Jaffna
alone
contributed
to
the
emergence
of
the
Tamil
Tigers.
If
that
is
so,
which
caste
does
Clint
Eastwood
belong
to?
I
pose
this
question
because
Prabhakaran
had
gone
on
record
to
acknowledge
the
influence
of
Clint
Eastwood
movies
in
developing
his
own
martial
acumen.
While
Sivaram
had
commented
on
the
links
the
current
DMK
leader
M.
Karunanidhi
developed
with
the
Maravar
community,
he
has
failed
to
note
that
more
than
Karunanidhi’s
journalistic
skills,
it
was
the
movies
of
Kandy-born
M.
G.
Ramachandran
which
brought
a
sense
of
martial
pride
to
the
Tamil
masses,
both
in
Tamilnadu
and
Sri
Lanka.
In
the
late
1940s
and
whole
of
1950s,
MGR
acted
in
a
series
of
Tamil
historical
costume-adventures
to
highlight
the
Tamil
martial
tradition.
Especially
successful
as
box-office
‘hits’
were
the
movies
with
names
that
began
with
the
first
syllable
‘Ma’.
The
names
of
these
movies
told
the
past
glory
of
Tamil.
These
include,
Manthri
Kumari
(Minister’s
Daughter),
Marutha
Naatu
Ilavarasi
(Princess
of
Marutha
Land),
Marma
Yogi
(Mysterious
Ascetic),
Malai
Kallan
(Mountain
Thief),
Madurai
Veeran
(Hero
of
Madurai),
Maha
Devi
(The
Great
Devi)
and
Mannaathi
Mannan
(King
of
Kings).
In
all
these
movies,
MGR
exhibited
his
martial
skills
to
thrill
his
fans.
There
is
no
doubt
that
Prabhakaran
and
his
original
band
were
more
influenced
by
these
MGR
movies
than
by
anything
else.
A
Post-script
in
2005
by
Sachi
Sri
Kantha
to
this
1992
Correspondence:
In
1992,
I
was
fully
aware
that
Mervyn
de
Silva,
the
editor
of
Lanka
Guardian,
exercised
his
editorial
pen
sharply;
thus
I
had
to
limit
my
critical
comments
to
a
maximum
of
300
words
for
this
type
of
unsolicited
correspondence,
if
I
wanted
to
see
my
letter
in
print.
Thus
I
exercised
word
economy,
as
well
as
‘hooks’
to
tease
Mervyn
de
Silva’s
erudite
eyes.
The
sarcastic
sentence,
"If
that
is
so,
which
caste
does
Clint
Eastwood
belong
to?"
was
one
of
such
‘hooks’,
and
I
didn’t
mean
it
to
undermine
author
Sivaram’s
scholarship.
Also,
I
didn’t
elaborate
further
on
the
probable
significance
of
MGR’s
fascination
with
the
alphabet
‘Ma’;
call
it
a
cryptic
acknowledgment
to
the
warrior
‘Maravar’
caste.
For
a
whole
decade
[the
1950s],
MGR
named
quite
a
number
of
his
costume-adventure
movies
with
the
first
syllable
‘Ma’.
It
is
also
not
inconsequential,
that
his
ancestors
belonged
to
the
Manradiyar
caste
of
Kovai
district,
Kangeyam
constituency,
who
settled
in
Maruthur
in
Kerala
state
[see,
Puratchi
Nadigar
MGR
(in
Tamil),
edited
by
Lena
Thamilvanan,
Manimegalai
Publishers,
Chennai,
1994,
2nd
edition,
p.6].
Then
in
the
1960s,
when
contemporary
social
themes
became
his
movie
vehicles,
MGR
chose
‘Thaa’
as
the
first
syllable
for
a
number
of
his
movie
titles
or
the
word
Thai
as
suffix
in
the
movie
titles.
Can
one
attach
any
significance
to
these
word
games
of
a
movie
star?
Cynics
may
say
no.
But,
movie
stars
–
like
politicians
and
sportsmen
–
also
have
superstitions
on
success
for
‘gains’,
‘hits’
or
‘runs’,
and
image-making
via
movie
careers
is
not
necessarily
limited
to
Tamil
Nadu.
Hollywood
had
given
birth
to
Ronald
Reagan
and
Arnold
Schwarzenegger.
Thus,
MGR
and
his
illustrious
contemporary
Sivaji
Ganesan
-
as
actor-politicians
–
who
dominated
the
Tamil
movies
from
1950s
to
1970s
and
made
producers
and
directors
dance
to
their
wishes
and
whims
-
may
not
have
been
exceptions.
Sivaji
Ganesan
also
had
a
series
of
successful
movies,
which
began
with
the
short
syllable
‘Pa’
or
long
syllable
‘Paa’
in
the
late
1950s
and
1960s.
Finally,
the
theme
of
kaval-karar
-
described
by
author
Sivaram
in
part
5
of
his
series
–
did
receive
attention
in
MGR’s
movies,
especially
in
his
successful
Madurai
Veeran
(1956)
movie.
Kavalkaran
was
also
the
title
of
another
MGR
movie
released
in
1967,
under
the
banner
of
his
own
company,
Sathya
Movies.
Comments
Post a Comment