Skip to main content

Manabharana Is Not Malay (Manabharana Bukan Melayu)

In recent times, an alarming narrative has emerged within the Malaysian blogosphere, suggesting a historical event that appears to be a misinterpretation or perhaps a deliberate misinformation campaign. The claim revolves around a so called Malay prince named Manabharana from Srivijaya, purportedly attacking and conquering the Chola kingdom. This misleading story has gained traction and is spreading like wildfire across various social media platforms. The need to address and rectify such inaccuracies is crucial not only for the sake of historical accuracy but also for fostering a responsible and informed online community. To delve into the matter, it is essential to clarify that historical records reveal the existence of multiple individuals named Manabharana throughout history. However, a nuanced understanding reveals that all these figures were Tamils (Damila) hailing from the Pandya kingdom, with references to their exploits documented in Tamil inscriptions and Sri Lankan chronicles
Post a Comment

Manabharana Is Not Malay (Manabharana Bukan Melayu)

In recent times, an alarming narrative has emerged within the Malaysian blogosphere, suggesting a historical event that appears to be a misinterpretation or perhaps a deliberate misinformation campaign. The claim revolves around a so called Malay prince named Manabharana from Srivijaya, purportedly attacking and conquering the Chola kingdom. This misleading story has gained traction and is spreading like wildfire across various social media platforms. The need to address and rectify such inaccuracies is crucial not only for the sake of historical accuracy but also for fostering a responsible and informed online community.

To delve into the matter, it is essential to clarify that historical records reveal the existence of multiple individuals named Manabharana throughout history. However, a nuanced understanding reveals that all these figures were Tamils (Damila) hailing from the Pandya kingdom, with references to their exploits documented in Tamil inscriptions and Sri Lankan chronicles. Remarkably, there is an absence of any historical records in Malaysia that would substantiate the claim of a Malay prince named Manabharana attacking the Chola kingdom.

The title "Manabharana" typically denotes a familial connection to the Pandyan royal lineage, often bestowed upon sons within the Pandyan dynasty. It is crucial to acknowledge that the Manabharana associated with the attack on the Chola country, earning the epithet "Cholakulantaka" (he who destroyed the Chola family), was indeed a Pandyan king. Contrary to the circulating narrative, this historical figure is not a Malay prince.

Similarly, it is worth mentioning that Kulothunga Chola I (1070-1120 AD) gave his princess Chudamali in marriage to prince Manabharana. This Manabharana was also known as Sri Virabahudevar or Pandiyanar Virapperumal. This Manabharana was the son of Jatavarman Srivallabha Pandya and princess Mitta, the younger sister of Sri Lankan king Vijayabahu (1055-1111 AD). (refer to page 227 below)

To further bolster this clarification, references from inscriptions have been attached, underscoring the importance of relying on authentic historical documents rather than perpetuating unfounded claims. The dissemination of inaccurate historical information not only distorts the understanding of the past but also has far-reaching consequences in shaping perceptions and narratives. In a globalized and interconnected world, it is imperative to approach historical accounts with discernment and to resist the temptation to propagate misinformation, as it can contribute to the erosion of accurate historical knowledge and the promotion of cultural misunderstandings. By emphasizing the importance of accuracy and critical thinking, we can collectively work towards fostering a more informed and responsible discourse in both online and offline spaces.

12th century inscription of the Ranganathasvamy Temple, Srirangam, makes reference to one Manabharana who lived earlier. He destroyed the Cholas (epithet Cholakulantaka) but this Manabharana is not a Malay from Sri Vijaya. He is a Tamil from Pandya kingdom.


Epigraphica Indica Vol XXXVIII (January 1969) by Archaeological Survey of India 
Epigraphica Indica Vol XXXVIII (January 1969) by Archaeological Survey of India 

Epigraphica Indica Vol XXXVIII (January 1969) by Archaeological Survey of India 

Epigraphica Indica Vol XXXVIII (January 1969) by Archaeological Survey of India 

Epigraphica Indica Vol XXXVIII (January 1969) by Archaeological Survey of India 

Epigraphica Indica Vol XXXVIII (January 1969) by Archaeological Survey of India 

Dictionary of Pali Proper Names, Volume 1 By G.P. Malalasekera


Dictionary of Pali Proper Names, Volume 1 By G.P. Malalasekera


Another Manabharana, also a Pandya. This is from South Indian Inscriptions, Volume III.

IV.- Inscriptions at Manimangalam
No. 29.- On the outside of the east wall of the inner prakara of the Rajagopala-Perumal temple
Finally, Rajendra dispatched an army to Ceylon, where the Kalinga king Vira-Salamegan was decapitated and the two sons of the Ceylon king Manabharanan were taken prisoners.  Another Vira-Salamegan, who is stated to have migrated to Ceylon from Kanyakubja, had been killed by Rajendra’s predecessor Rajadhiraja.[11]  The same Chola king had decapitated another Manabharana, who was, however, a Pandya king and not a king of Ceylon.[12]  The Mahavamsa mentions two princes of the name Manabharana, and two others of the name Kittisirimegha.  Manabharana I.[13] and Kittisirimegha I. were nephews and sons-in-law of the Ceylon king Vijayabahu I. (chapter lix. Verses 42 and 44).  His queen Tilokasundari was a princess of Kalinga (ibid. verse 29 f.).[14]  Manabharanan and Vira-Salamegan in the subjoined inscription might correspond to Manabharana and Kittisirimegha in the Mahavamsa, and the reason why Vira-Salamegan is styled a Kalinga king in the inscription might be thefact that his mother-in-law was a Kalinga princess according to the Mahavamsa.  On the other hand king Vijayabahu I. is supposed to have reigned from A.D. 1065 to 1120, and Vikkamabahu I. in whose time Manabharana I. and Kittisirimegha I.  usurped the government of Ceylon, from A.D. 1121 to 1142, while Rajendra and Virarajendra I. have to be accommodated between A.D. 1050 and 1070.[15]  Consequently, Manabharana and Vira-Salamegan in the inscription must be distinct from, and prior to, Manabharana I. and Kittisirimegha I. in the Mahavamsa.  But, as I have previously stated (p. 39 above), the conquest of Ceylon by Rajendra is established by the existence of an inscription of his in that island.















Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Indian confusion - Race, Caste, Clan & Surnames

Before you read, keep in mind that this was not written with the intention to divide the people. It was written with the intention to explain the meaning of each group. The write up on my journey in Bali is still in progress. I have to transfer some image files in order to upload them. So I thought of writing about the biggest confusion in the Indian Malaysian community. It is a sensitive one too. But clarification should be given. Else, when are we going to understand it? To my friends of other races who happened to read my blog, this will probably be enlightening as many may not be aware of our demographics. First of all, there are two main classification for us in Malaysia. Indian & Ceylonese. Many assume it to be a homogenous race like Chinese, but it isn't. The Chinese have many languages but they have a common language called Mandarin. They also have one writing script. This is what makes the over 1 billion Chinese worldwide as a homogenous race. Ancient Chinese
103 comments
Read more

Dogs of Tamil Nadu

Pictures taken from Google. Credit goes to the various people who uploaded them. I apologise for not being able to identify the original owner of the pics. Whenever we speak of dogs, we tend to focus on the European breeds.  This is due to their popularity and demand. Unknown to many, India has about 88 native dog breeds. Six of these breeds are from the southern state of Tamil Nadu. Most of these dogs from Tamil Nadu evolved naturally. That makes them more suitable to the hot climate in the south. Furthermore, these dogs require less medical attention as their immune system is stronger, making them less prone to disease which are common among the European breeds. In Tamil Nadu, we can find breeds like the famous Rajapalayam, Kombai, Alangu Mastiff, Chippiparai, Kanni and Malayeri. Both the Alangu Mastiff and Malayeri are now extinct. Malayeri The Malayeri (hill climber) was a shepherd dog used by the tribals to herd sheeps. It was commonly found in the hills of Tamil Nadu-K
92 comments
Read more

How To Find Your Kula Deivam?

*DISCLAIMER-Article written from a believer's perspective.  One of the most common questions I get from my readers is  "How do I find my Kula Deivam?" Kula Deivam is the patron deity of your lineage. Some families have more than 1 deity.  The easiest way to know your Kula Deivam is of course by knowing the ancestral village of your patrilineal lineage (father's side).  Usually the Kula Deivam shrines will be in the ancestral village. If the family has migrated to several villages, then the shrine will usually be in the main village where the family originated from. Knowing your caste or clan background is also helpful in finding out more about your Kula Deivam. For females, they have an advantage. They also inherit the Kula Deivam from their matrilineal lineage (mother's side). So if you are a woman, your mother's Kula Deivam (from her mother) will continue to be present throughout your life. If you are married, your husband's Kula Deivam (from
18 comments
Read more